Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuro-oncology outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has uprooted healthcare systems worldwide, disrupting care and increasing dependence on alternative forms of health care delivery. It is yet to be determined how the pandemic affected neuro-oncology patient outcomes, given that the majority of even "elective" neurosurgical oncology procedures are time-sensitive. This study quantifies changes in neuro-oncological care during the height of the pandemic and investigates patient outcomes in 2020 compared to a historical control. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with malignant brain tumor diagnoses who were seen at our institution between March 13 and May 1 of 2020 and 2019. Alterations in care, including shift from in-person to telehealth, delays in evaluation and intervention, and treatment modifications were evaluated. These variables were analyzed with respect to brain tumor control and mortality. RESULTS: 112 patients from 2020 to 166 patients from 2019 were included. There was no significant difference in outcomes between the cohorts, despite significantly more treatment delays (p = 0.0160) and use of telehealth (p < 0.0001) in 2020. Patients in 2020 who utilized telehealth visits had significantly more stable tumor control than those who had office visits (p = 0.0124), consistent with appropriate use of in-person visits for patients with progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that use of telehealth and selective alterations in neuro-oncological care during the COVID-19 pandemic did not lead to adverse patient outcomes. This suggests that adaptive physician-led changes were successful and may inform management during the ongoing pandemic, especially with the emergence of the Delta variant.

COVID-19: A Time Like No Other in (the Department of) Neurological Surgery.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted lives and indelibly impacted the practice of medicine since emerging as a pandemic in March 2020. For neurosurgery departments throughout the United States, the pandemic has created unique challenges across subspecialties in devising methods of triage, workflow, and operating room safety. Located in New York City, at the early epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis, the Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Neurological Surgery was disrupted and challenged in many ways, requiring adaptations in clinical operations, workforce management, research, and education. Through our department's collective experience, we offer a glimpse at how our faculty and administrators overcame obstacles, and transformed in the process, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Neurosurgery in COVID-19 Ground Zero: The Weill Cornell Medicine Experience.

The mobilization of subspecialty departments in reaction to the unique demands of the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City was swift and left little time for reflection and commemoration. The early days of the pandemic brought unprecedented stressors on the medical system that necessitated a restructuring of hospitals, reallocation of health care workers, and a shift in care and education paradigms to meet patient care demands and public health needs. As the number of cases, intensive care unit patients, and deaths skyrocketed in New York City, many struggled with a somewhat paradoxical difficulty in perceiving the human value of what these numbers mean. Easily lost in the statistics are the stories and experiences of the physicians and trainees who were counted on to halt their own clinical practices and adapt their skillsets to tackle the pandemic. In this article, we present 10 brief narratives from the student members of the Neurosurgery Publication Group at Weill Cornell Medical College and members of the Weill Cornell Medicine Neurological Surgery Residency Program and Department of Neurological Surgery faculty. Reflecting on these individual experiences gives us an opportunity to simultaneously contribute to a history of New York City's reaction to COVID-19 and commemorate the individuals who were impacted by or succumbed to this disease.

Characterization of Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Stroke in a Diverse Cohort of COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: COVID-19 is a known risk factor for stroke. There is limited data on the influence of demographics, risk factors, and hematologic function on outcomes in COVID-19 stroke patients. METHODS: All patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke tested for COVID-19 and treated from March 13 through May 19, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. COVID+ patients were compared to COVID- patients and a historical cohort from 2019. RESULTS: 84 patients with radiographic acute stroke from the 2020 study period and 152 patients in the historical cohort were included. Stroke incidence in COVID+ patients was 1.5%, with a significant decline in total stroke presentations during this period compared to 2019. 37 patients were COVID+ and 47 patients were COVID-. 32% of COVID+ stroke patients were Hispanic compared to 15% and 18% in the COVID- and 2019 cohorts respectively (p = 0.069 and 0.07). COVID+ stroke patients were younger, had higher rates of hemorrhagic conversion (p = 0.034), higher initial NIHSS (p < 0.001), increased cryptogenic stroke mechanism (p = 0.02), and higher mortality independent of COVID-19 severity. COVID+ patients had higher rates of thrombocytopenia (p = 0.02), and were less likely to be on antiplatelet therapy (p = 0.025). In multivariable analysis, only COVID-19 status independently predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: COVID status, independent of severity, was significantly associated with higher mortality in stroke patients. COVID+ stroke patients were younger and less likely to be on antiplatelets, with higher rates of thrombocytopenia, suggesting a possible role for antiplatelet use in this population.